Operación de la Corte Suprema de Estados Unidos

Periodo y casos anuales.

«The Term of the Court begins, by law, on the first Monday in October and lasts until the first Monday in October of the next year. Each Term, approximately 7,000-8,000 new cases are filed in the Supreme Court. This is a substantially larger volume of cases than was presented to the Court in the last century. In the 1950 Term, for example, the Court received only 1,195 new cases, and even as recently as the 1975 Term it received only 3,940. Plenary review, with oral arguments by attorneys, is currently granted in about 80 of those cases each Term, and the Court typically disposes of about 100 or more cases without plenary review. The publication of each Term’s written opinions, including concurring opinions, dissenting opinions, and orders, can take up thousands of pages. During the drafting process, some opinions may be revised a dozen or more times before they are announced.»

https://www.supremecourt.gov/about/courtatwork.aspx

Caso sobre redes sociales en USA

Son dos casos en realidad.

Es probable que el caso se falle antes del fin del actual periodo, o sea tal vez en junio del año entrante.

«The court will hear the cases this term, which began Monday, with a decision expected before the court recesses for the summer, usually in late June. The court did not say when it would hear arguments, but the court has already filled its argument calendar for October and November.»

VOA, «US Supreme Court Will Hear Social Media Terrorism Lawsuits», https://www.voanews.com/a/us-supreme-court-will-hear-social-media-terrorism-lawsuits-/6773833.html

Un resumen

Breve historia

El fenómeno

Examen del tema

Revisión

El caso

La sección 230 de la Ley de Decencia en las Comunicaciones de 1996

«ningún proveedor o usuario de un servicio informático interactivo será tratado como el editor o hablante de cualquier información proporcionada por otro proveedor de contenido de información»»

https://www.independentespanol.com/tecnologia/seccion-230-regla-internet-twitter-facebook-google-b1401498.html

Algunos fallos de interés:

«‘(I)mperative is the need to preserve inviolate the constitutional rights of free speech, free press and free assembly in order to maintain the opportunity for free political discussion, to the end that government may be responsive to the will of the people and that changes, if desired, may be obtained by peaceful means. Therein lies the security of the Republic, the very foundation of constitutional government.'»

De Jonge v. Oregon, 299 U.S. 353